NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION

Notice of 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Sincerely,

/s/ David G. HugleyR. Eddie Dixon, Jr.

Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

March 31, 2016April 1, 2019

PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION

PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION

PROXY STATEMENT

INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING

General

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of National Instruments Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“NI”), has made proxy materials available to you on the Internet or, upon your request, has delivered printed versions of proxy materials to you by mail, in connection with the Board’s solicitation of proxies for use at NI’s 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on May 10, 2016,14, 2019, at 9:00 a.m., local time, or at any adjournments or postponements thereof, for the purposes set forth in this Proxy Statement and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Annual Meeting will be held at NI’s principal executive offices at 11500 North Mopac Expressway, Building C, Austin, Texas 78759. NI’s telephone number is(512) 338-9119.683-0100.

Under rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), NI is now furnishing proxy materials to NI’s stockholders on the Internet, rather than mailing printed copies of those materials to each stockholder. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request one. Instead, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will instruct you as to how you may access and review the proxy materials on the Internet. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. We anticipate that the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be mailed to stockholders on or about March 31, 2016.April 1, 2019.

Householding of Annual Meeting Materials

Some brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” notices of Internet availability of proxy materials, proxy statements and annual reports. This means that only one (1) copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials may have been sent to multiple stockholders living in a stockholder’sthe same household. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and, as applicable, any of these documentsadditional proxy materials to any stockholder who contacts our investor relations department at 11500 North Mopac Expressway, Austin, Texas 78759-3504,(512) 683-5090,683-8092, requesting such copies. If a stockholder isstockholders living in the same household are receiving multiple copies of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or the printed versions of such other accounts at the stockholder’s householdproxy materials and would like to receive a single copy of these documents for a stockholder’s household in the future, the stockholders should contact their broker, other nominee record holder, or our investor relations department to request mailing of a single copy of any of these documents.

Record Date; Outstanding Shares

Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 11, 201615, 2019 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to receive notice of and vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, 127,822,071132,899,759 shares of NI’s common stock, $0.01 par value, were issued and outstanding.

Voting and Solicitation

Every stockholder of record on the Record Date is entitled, for each share held, to one vote on each proposal that comes before the Annual Meeting. In the election of directors in Proposal One, each stockholder will be entitled to vote for two nominees and the two nominees with the greatest number of votes will be elected. However, any nominee for director in an uncontested election who receives a

greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election shall promptly

tender his or her resignation following certification of the stockholder vote. See “Proposal One: Election of Directors—Vote Required; Recommendation of Board of Directors” for additional information on these guidelines.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal at the Annual Meeting will be required to approve Proposal Two.Proposals Two, Three and Four.

Whether you hold shares directly as the stockholder of record or beneficially in street name, you may vote on the Internet, by telephone or, if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials, by completing, signing and mailing the proxy card enclosed therewith in the postage-prepaid envelope provided for that purpose. Voting over the Internet, by telephone or by written proxy will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting, if you do not attend in person. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please review the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials you received in the mail or the proxy card if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials.

The cost of this solicitation will be borne by NI. NI may reimburse expenses incurred by brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares in forwarding solicitation materials to beneficial owners. Proxies may be solicited by certain of NI’s directors, officers and other employees, without additional compensation, personally, by telephone or by email.

Treatment of Abstentions and BrokerNon-Votes

Abstentions will be counted for purposes of determining (i) either the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business and (ii) the total number of votes cast with respect to a proposal (other than the election of directors). Accordingly, abstentions will have no effect on the election of directors in Proposal One, and abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against Proposal Two.Proposals Two, Three and Four.

While brokernon-votes will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business, brokernon-votes will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast with respect to the particular proposal on which the broker has expressly not voted. Thus, brokernon-votes will not affect the outcome of the voting on Proposals One, and Two.Two, Three or Four.

A broker will vote your shares only if the proposal is a matter on which your broker has discretion to vote (such as the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm in Proposal Two)Three), or if you provide instructions on how to vote by following the instructions provided to you by your broker.

Tabulation and Reporting of Voting Results

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Final voting results will be tallied by the inspector of election after the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting. NI will publish the final voting results in a Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting.

Revocability of Proxies

Proxies given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked at any time before they have been used. You may change or revoke your proxy by entering a new vote by Internet or by telephone or by delivering a written notice of revocation to the Secretary of NI or by completing a new proxy card bearing a later date (which automatically revokes the earlier proxy instructions). Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request by notifying the inspector of elections of your intention to revoke your proxy and votingvote in person at the Annual Meeting.

DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Stockholders of NI may submit proper proposals for inclusion in NI’s Proxy Statement and for consideration at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 20172020 by submitting their proposals in writing to the Secretary of NI in a timely manner. In order to be considered for inclusion in NI’s proxy materials for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2017,2020, stockholder proposals must be

received by the Secretary of NI no later than December 1, 2016,3, 2019, and must otherwise comply with the requirements of Rule14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

In addition, Under NI’s amended Bylaws a stockholder (or a group of not more than 20 stockholders) that has held at least 3% of NI’s outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years may nominate and include in our proxy materials for our 2020 annual meeting, director nominees constituting up to the greater of 20% of the number of persons serving on the Board or two directors, provided that such nominees do not exceed half of the directors to be elected at an annual meeting and that the requirements set forth in the Bylaws are satisfied. To utilize such “proxy access” nomination process, among other things, the electing stockholder(s) and proposed nominee(s) must comply with the detailed requirements set forth in our Bylaws, including the provision of the proposing stockholder information, various other required information, representations, undertakings, agreements and other requirements as set forth in the Bylaws and as required by law. One such requirement is that the nomination(s) must be received in a timely manner between 120 days and 150 days prior to the anniversary of the date our proxy statement was first sent to stockholders in connection with the last annual meeting, which for our proxy materials for the 2020 annual meeting would be no earlier than November 3, 2019 and no later than December 3, 2019.

NI’s bylaws establish an advance notice procedure with regard to business to be brought before an annual meeting, including stockholder proposals not included in NI’s Proxy Statement. For director nominations or other business to be properly brought before NI’s 20172020 annual meeting by a stockholder, such stockholder must deliver written notice to the Secretary of NI at NI’s principal executive office no later than January 30, 2017February 1, 2020 and no earlier than December 31, 2016.January 2, 2020. If the date of NI’s 20172020 annual meeting is advanced or delayed by more than 30 calendar days from the first anniversary date of the 20162019 Annual Meeting, your notice of a proposal will be timely if it is received by NI by the close of business on the later of (i) the 90th day prior to the 20172020 annual meeting and (ii) the 10th day following the day NI first publicly announces the date of the 20172020 annual meeting.

The proxy grants the proxy holders discretionary authority to vote on any matter raised at the Annual Meeting. If a stockholder fails to comply with the foregoing notice provisions, proxy holders will be allowed to use their discretionary voting authority on such matter should the stockholder proposal come before the 20172020 annual meeting.

The description of certain provisions of the Bylaws above is intended as a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the relevant Bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates. A copy of the full text of the bylaw provisions governing the notice requirements set forth above may be obtained by writing to the Secretary of NI. All notices of proposals and director nominations by stockholders should be sent to National Instruments Corporation, 11500 North Mopac Expressway, Building C, Austin, Texas 78759, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

General

NI’s Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with the term of the office of one class expiring each year. The authorized number of directors which constitutes the entire Board of Directors is currently eight,nine, with twothree directors in Class I, three directors in Class II, and three directors in Class III.

The terms of office of Class I directors Dr. James J. Truchard and Mr. John M. Berra, Mr. James E. Cashman, III and Mr. Liam K. Griffin will expire at the 2019 annual meeting. On September 19, 2018, Mr. Berra informed the Board that he will not stand forre-election as a director at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Berra’s decision was taken in consideration of the retirement policy provisions of NI’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. There was no disagreement or dispute between Mr. Berra and NI that led to his decision not to stand forre-election. Upon completion of Mr. Berra’s current term as a director, the Board intends to reduce the size of the board to eight members. NI’s Board of Directors has nominated Dr.Mr. James J. TruchardE. Cashman, III and Mr. John M. BerraLiam K. Griffin for election at the Annual Meeting as Class I directors at the Annual Meeting.to serve for a term of three years. The terms of office of Class II directors Mr. Jeffrey L. Kodosky, Dr. Donald M. Carlton and Mr. Michael E. McGrath, and Mr. Alexander M. Davern will expire at the 20172020 annual meeting. The terms of office of Class III directors Ms. Duy-Loan T. Le, Mr. Charles J. Roesslein,Ms. Duy-Loan T. Le, and Dr. Gerhard P. Fettweis will expire at the 20182021 annual meeting.

Under the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”), a majority of the Board of Directors must be comprised of independent directors. The Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Berra, Dr. Carlton,Roesslein, Ms. Le, Mr. McGrath,Berra, Mr. Roesslein andMcGrath, Dr. Fettweis, Mr. Cashman and Mr. Griffin is independent under applicable Nasdaq listing standards and Rule10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Vote Required; Recommendation of Board of Directors

The nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote in the election of directors shall be elected to the Board of Directors. Votes withheld from any director are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum, but have no legal effect under Delaware law. Cumulative voting is not permitted by NI’s Certificate of Incorporation.

Under NI’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, any nominee for director in an uncontested election (i.e., an election where the only nominees are those recommended by the Board) who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election shall promptly tender his or her resignation following certification of the stockholder vote.

In such event, the Nomination and Governance Committee will promptly consider the tendered resignation and will recommend to the Board whether to accept the tendered resignation or to take some other action, such as rejecting the tendered resignation and addressing the apparent underlying causes of the “withheld” votes. In making this recommendation, the Nomination and Governance Committee will consider all factors deemed relevant by its members including, without limitation, the underlying reasons why stockholders “withheld” votes for election from such director (if ascertainable), the length of service and qualifications of the director whose resignation has been tendered, the director’s contributions to NI, whether by accepting such resignation NI will no longer be in compliance with any applicable law, rule, regulation or governing document, and whether or not accepting the resignation is in the best interests of NI and its stockholders.

The Board will promptly act on the Nomination and Governance Committee’s recommendation no later than 90 days following its receipt of such recommendation. In considering the Nomination and Governance Committee’s recommendation, the Board will consider the factors considered by the Nomination and Governance Committee and such additional information and factors the Board believes to be relevant.

Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for NI’s nominees named below. If any nominee of NI is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who is designated by the present Board of Directors

to fill the vacancy. It is not expected that any nominee will be unable or will decline to serve as a director.

The Board Of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the nominees listed below.

Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting

The Nomination and Governance Committee, consisting solely of independent directors as determined under applicable Nasdaq listing standards, recommended the two individuals set forth in the table below for nomination by our full Board of Directors. Based on such recommendation, our Board of Directors nominated such directors for election at the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the two individuals set forth in the table below is independent under applicable Nasdaq listing standards and Rule10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The following sets forth information concerning the nominees for election as directors at the Annual Meeting, including information as to each nominee’s age as of the Record Date, current principal occupation and business experience.

INCUMBENT DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS OF OFFICE

CONTINUE AFTER THE ANNUAL MEETING

The following sets forth information concerning the directors whose terms of office continue after the Annual Meeting, including information as to each director’s age as of the Record Date, current principal occupation and business experience.

		Michael E. McGrath, 6669 - Director since May 2014; Former Chief Executive Officer of i2 Technologies and Pittiglio Rabin Todd & McGrath, Business Strategy Consultant.   Business Experience: Mr. McGrath is a highlyan experienced executive, director, entrepreneur and bestselling author dealing with decision makingauthor. His areas of expertise include strategy, product development, decision-making techniques, supply chain, and processes. He is a frequent featured guest on business television segments and his advice has appeared in many publications.autonomous vehicles. He served as a director of i2 Technologies, a supply chain management and software services company, from September 2004 to May 2008, and as its CEO and President from February 2005 to July 2007. He served on the board of directors of Entrust, Inc., from February 2007, and as Chairman of the Board starting in November 2008, until the company was sold in July 2009. He served as executive chairman of the board of The Thomas Group from February 2008 to March 2012, and as acting CEO for a period of time. The Thomas Group filed for bankruptcy protection in March 2012. He also served on the board of Sensable Technologies from 2000 until 2009 and served on the board of Revolution Analytics from 2014 until 2015. He was a founder and the Chief Executive Officer of Pittiglio Rabin Todd & McGrath, a global management consulting firm, for 28 years, retiring from the firm in July 2004. Mr. McGrath is the author ofAutonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Strategies, and Disruptions, Product Strategy for High-Technology Companies, Next Generation Product Development, Business Decisions, and other books. Mr. McGrath received his bachelor’s degree in Computer Science from Boston College, and his master’s degree in Business Administration from Harvard Business School.   The Board concluded that Mr. McGrath should serve as a director because he has an extensive background in product development strategy, strategic product marketing, and software services. Having served as CEO of i2 Technologies, a vendor of supply chain management software, he has knowledge of software systems, experience selling into corporate opportunities, and experience developing large accounts. In particular, he has experience with management functions including software marketing and sales force management activities, and software development. He is an experienced consultant and author with knowledge of cloud computing and smartmobile applications, which are relevant for NI’s business. In 2015, he servedMr. McGrath serves as a memberthe Chair of the Compensation Committee.Board of Directors. He currently serves as a member of the Audit Committee, a member of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Nomination and Governance Committee.

		Charles J. Roesslein, 67 - Director since July 2000; Former Chief Executive Officer of Austin Tele-Services, LLC. Business Experience: Mr. Roesslein was the co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Austin Tele-Services, LLC, which is in the secondary market for telecom and IT assets, from 2004 until 2016 when his interests were sold. During 2000, Mr. Roesslein served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors and President of Prodigy Communications Corporation, an internet service provider. He served as President of SBC-CATV, a cable television service provider, from 1999 until 2000, and as President of SBC Technology Resources, the applied research division of SBC Communications Inc., from 1997 until 1999. Prior to 1997, Mr. Roesslein served in executive officer positions with SBC Communications, Inc. and Southwestern Bell. Mr. Roesslein holds a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Missouri-Columbia and a master’s degree in Finance from the University of Missouri-Kansas City. Mr. Roesslein is currently a director of Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc., a publicly traded company. The Board concluded that Mr. Roesslein should be nominated and serve as a director because he brings a wealth of financial and executive experience to the Board including extensive experience in the development of large accounts while serving Southwestern Bell Corporation’s customers. He also has a strong financial background, having served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Southwestern Bell Publications and as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. Mr. Roesslein has an extensive high level background in the telecom industry and in telecom technologies. In 2015, he served as a member of the Audit Committee and a member of the Nomination and Governance Committee. He currently serves as a member of the Audit Committee and a member of the Nomination and Governance Committee.

		Gerhard P. Fettweis, PhD, 5457 - Director since March 2016; Vodafone Chair Professor at the Technical University of Dresden.   Business Experience: Since September 1994, Dr. Fettweis has served as the Vodafone Chair Professor of Electrical Engineering at the Technical University of Dresden, where his research focuses on next generation wireless systems. In connection with that role, he hasspun-out ten twelve startup companies from the university. From August 2015 to February 2016, he served as a visiting professor at the University of California at Berkeley and as a senior researcher at the International Computer Science Institute. Dr. Fettweis is a member of the German National Academy of Science and Engineering and a fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (“IEEE”). He has received numerous awards including a recognition award for outstanding technicalrecognizing his contributions fromin the IEEE Wireless Communications Technical Committee and the Stuart Meyer Memorial Award from the IEEE Vehicular Technology Society, both in 2014.field of electrical engineering. Dr. Fettweis has authored orco-authored two books and is listed as an inventor on over thirty issued patents. Dr. Fettweis received hisDipl.-Ing. in Electrical Engineering in 1986 and his PhD in Electrical Engineering in 1990, each from Aachen University of Technology.   The Board concluded that Dr. Fettweis should serve as a director because of his strong technical background and extensive knowledge in electrical engineering, as well as his experience in science, technology and business. Additionally, he is very involved in the scientific community and has leadership and management experience through his role as the Vodafone Chair Professor at the Technical University of Dresden. He isserves as a member of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Nomination and Governance Committee.

There is no family relationship between any director, director nominee or executive officer of NI.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of NI’s common stock as of the Record Date (i) by all persons known to NI, based on statements filed by such persons pursuant to Section 13(d) or 13(g) of the Exchange Act, to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of NI’s common stock, (ii) by each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table under “Executive Compensation,” (iii) by each director and director nominee, and (iv) by all current directors and executive officers as a group:

(14)(13)

Includes 4,2234,356 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of March 11, 2016.15, 2019.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Meetings and Committees

The Board of Directors of NI held a total of ninesix meetings during 2015.2018. The Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nomination and Governance Committee.

Each director, other than Dr. Carlton,During 2018, all directors attended at least 75%100% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board of Directors on which he or she served.served, other than Mr. Kodosky. Mr. Kodosky attended four of six Board meetings, one of whichnon-attended meetings was scheduled on short notice. NI encourages, but does not require, its board members to attend NI’s annual meeting of stockholders. In 2015, all2018, six of our directors with the exception of Mr. McGrath and Dr. Carlton, attended NI’s annual meeting.

Board Leadership Structure

TheIn September 2018, the Board appointed Mr. McGrath, an independent member of the Board, as Chair of the Board of Directors believes that NI’s Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Truchard,Directors. In such role, Mr. McGrath is best situated to serve as Chairman because he isresponsible for coordinating the director most familiar with NI’s businessactivities of the Board, chairing all meetings of the Board, developing agendas for such meetings, building a productive relationship between the Board and industry, and most capable of effectively identifying strategic priorities and leading the discussion and execution of strategy. Dr. Truchard is also a founder of NI and NI’s largest stockholder. The Board’s independent directors and management directors have different perspectives and roles in strategic development. NI’s independent directors bring experience, oversight and expertise from outside the company and industry, while the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), and assisting the other management director bring company-specific experienceBoard in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in NI’s strategy, risk oversight and expertise.succession planning. The Board believes its current leadership structure best serves the objectives of Directorsthe Board’s oversight of management, the Board’s ability to carry out its roles and responsibilities on behalf of NI’s stockholders, and NI’s overall corporate governance. The Board also believes that the combined roleseparation of Chairmanthe Chair and Chief Executive Officer promotes strategy developmentCEO roles allows the CEO to focus his time and execution,energy on operating and facilitates information flow between managementmanaging NI, while leveraging the Chair’s experience and theperspectives. The Board of Directors, which are essentialperiodically reviews its leadership structure to effective governance.determine whether it continues to best serve NI does not have a lead independent director.and its stockholders.

The NI Board oversees risk management in a number of ways. The Audit Committee oversees the management of financial and accounting related risks as an integral part of its duties. Similarly, the Compensation Committee considers risk management when setting the compensation policies and programs for NI’s executive officers and other employees. The full Board of Directors receives reports on various risk related items at each of its regular meetings including risks related to NI manufacturing operations, intellectual property, taxes, products and employees. The Board also receives periodic reports on NI’s efforts to manage such risks through safety measures, insurance or self-insurance.

Communications to the Board of Directors

Stockholders may communicate with members of the Board of Directors by mail addressed to the Chairman,Chair, any other individual member of the Board, to the full Board, or to a particular committee of the Board. In each case, such correspondence should be sent to the following address: 11500 North Mopac Expressway, Building C, Austin, Texas 78759, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Correspondence received that is addressed to the members of the Board of the Directors will be reviewed by NI’s General Counsel or his designee, who will forward such correspondence to the appropriate members of the Board of the Directors.

Audit Committee

During 2015, theThe Audit Committee, consisted of directors Donald M. Carlton, Charles J. Roesslein, and John M. Berra and met six times. Currently, the Audit Committeewhich currently consists of directors Charles J. Roesslein (Chair),Duy-Loan T. Le, John M. Berra, and Michael E. McGrath, and Duy-Loan T. Le.met five times during 2018. The Audit Committee appoints, compensates, retains and oversees the engagement of NI’s independent registered public accounting firm, reviews with such independent registered public accounting firm the plan, scope and results of their examination of NI’s consolidated financial statements and reviews the independence of such

independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee maintains free and open

communication with NI’s independent registered public accounting firm and the internal audit department, overseeing the internal audit function and NI’s management team. The Audit Committee inquires about any significant risks or exposures and assesses the steps management has taken to minimize such risks to NI, including the adequacy of insurance coverage and the strategy for management of foreign currency risk. The Audit Committee also reviews NI’s compliance with matters relating to environmental, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, export and SEC regulations. The Audit Committee has established procedures to promote and protect employee reporting of (i) suspected fraud or wrongdoing relating to accounting, auditing or financial reporting matters and (ii) complaints and concerns regarding a violation of the federal securities laws, including (A) receiving, retaining and addressing complaints received by NI relating to such matters, (B) enabling employees to submit on a confidential and anonymous basis any concerns regarding such matters; and (C) protecting reporting employees from retaliation. The Board of Directors believes that each director who currently serves as a member of the Audit Committee or who served as a member of the Audit Committee in 2015 is an “independent director” as that term is defined by the Nasdaq listing standards and Rule10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Roesslein is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC rules. The charter of the Audit Committee is available on NI’s website at http://www.ni.com/pdf/nati/corporategovernance/composition_charters.htm.us/audit_committee_charter.pdf.

Nomination and Governance Committee

During 2015, theThe Nomination and Governance Committee, consistedwhich currently consists of directors John M. Berra (Chair), Charles J. Roesslein, Donald M. Carlton,Michael E. McGrath,Duy-Loan T. Le, and John M. Berra,Gerhard P. Fettweis, each of whom was deemed to be an “independent director” as that term is defined by the Nasdaq listing standards, and met two times. Currently, the Nomination and Governance Committee consists of directors Charles J. Roesslein, John M. Berra, Michael E. McGrath and Duy-Loan T. Le, each of whom is deemed to be an “independent director” as that term is defined by the Nasdaq listing standards.five times during 2018. The Nomination and Governance Committee recommends to the Board of Directors the selection criteria for board members, compensation of outside directors, appointment of board committee members and committee chairpersons, and develops board governance principles. The Nomination and Governance Committee will consider nominees recommended by stockholders provided such recommendations are made in accordance with procedures described in this Proxy Statement under “Deadline for Receipt of Stockholder Proposals.” When considering a potential director candidate, the Nomination and Governance Committee looks for demonstrated character, judgment, relevant business, functional and industry experience, and a high degree of acumen. The Nomination and Governance Committee also considers issues of diversity, such as education, gender, professional experience and differences in viewpoints and skills. The Nomination and Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity; however, the Board of Directors and the Nomination and Governance Committee believe that it is important that the members of the Board of Directors represent diverse viewpoints. The Nomination and Governance Committee’s process for identifying and evaluating nominees typically involves a series of internal discussions, review of information concerning candidates and interviews with selected candidates. There are no differences in the manner in which the Nomination and Governance Committee evaluates nominees for director based on whether the nominee is recommended by a stockholder. NI does not pay any third partyThe Nomination and Governance Committee engaged SpencerStuart, an executive search firm, to identify or assist the committee in identifying orand evaluating potential nominees. As part of its engagement, SpencerStuart identified James Cashman and Liam Griffin as nominees for director. The charter of the Nomination and Governance Committee is available on NI’s website at http://www.ni.com/pdf/nati/corporategovernance/composition_charters.htm.us/n_and_g_charter_final.pdf.

Compensation Committee

During 2015, theThe Compensation Committee, consistedwhich currently consists of directorsDuy-Loan T. Le (Chair), John M. Berra, and Michael E. McGrath, and Gerhard P. Fettweis, each of whom was deemed to be an “independent director” as that term is defined by applicable SEC rules, Nasdaq listing standards and other requirements, and met six times. Currently, the Compensation Committee consists of directors John M. Berra, Michael E. McGrath, Duy-Loan T. Le and Gerhard P. Fettweis, each of whom is deemed to be an “independent director” as that term is defined by applicable SEC

rules, Nasdaq listing standards and other requirements.five times during 2018. The charter of the Compensation Committee is available on NI’s website at http://www.ni.com/pdf/nati/corporategovernance/composition_charters.htm.

The Compensation Committee seeks input from NI’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Truchard, when discussing the performance of, and compensation levels for, executives other than himself. The Compensation Committee also works closely with Dr. Truchard and NI’s vice president of human resources and others as required in evaluating the financial, accounting, tax and retention implications of NI’s various compensation programs. The vice president of human resources regularly attends the meetings of the Compensation Committee and, at such meetings, provides advice on compensation matters to the Compensation Committee. The vice president of human resources also provides guidance to the Compensation Committee concerning compensation matters as they relate to NI’s executive officers. Neither Dr. Truchard, the vice president of human resources, nor any of NI’s other executives participates in deliberations relating to his own compensation.us/comp_charter.pdf.

Under the terms of its charter, the Compensation Committee establishesrecommends the compensation of NI’s Chief Executive Officer to the independent members of the Board for approval, evaluates the

performance of NI’s executive officers, and establishes the salaries and cash bonus compensation of the executive officers. When establishing the salaries and cash bonus compensation for the executive officers based onother than the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee also periodically examines NI’s compensation structure to evaluate whether NI is rewarding its officers and other personnel in a manner consistent with sound industry practices and makes recommendations on such matters to NI’s management and Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee also has oversight responsibility for NI’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Incentive Plan”), NI’s 2010 Incentive Plan (the “2010 Incentive Plan”), and NI’s 2005 Incentive Plan (the “2005 Incentive Plan”), and Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Board of Directors may by resolution prescribe additional authority and duties to the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee obtains input from NI’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Davern, when discussing the performance of, and compensation levels for, executives other than himself. The Compensation Committee also works closely with Mr. Davern and NI’s Vice President of Global Human Resources and others as required in evaluating the financial, accounting, tax and retention implications of NI’s various compensation programs. The Vice President of Global Human Resources regularly attends the meetings of the Compensation Committee and, at such meetings, provides advice on compensation matters to the Compensation Committee. The Vice President of Global Human Resources also provides guidance to the Compensation Committee concerning compensation matters as they relate to NI’s executive officers. Neither Mr. Davern, the Vice President of Global Human Resources, nor any of NI’s other executives participates in deliberations relating to his or her own compensation.

The Compensation Committee’s charter does not contain a provision providing for the delegation of its duties to other persons. The Compensation Committee has not delegated any of its authority.

For a discussion of NI’s utilization of compensation consultants, see “Compensation“Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The members of the Compensation Committee are set forth in the “Compensation“Corporate Governance—Compensation Committee” section of this proxy statementProxy Statement and do not include any NI executive officers. During 2015,2018, no NI executive officer served on the compensation committee (or equivalent), or the board of directors, of another entity whose executive officer(s) served on NI’s Compensation Committee. During 2015,2018, no NI executive officer served on the compensation committee (or equivalent) of another entity whose executive officer(s) served as a member of the NI Board of Directors.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Transactions with Related Persons

NI had no related party transactions requiring disclosure under applicable SEC rules for the year ended December 31, 20152018 and has no such related party transaction currently proposed.

Policy and Procedures for Review, Approval, or Ratification of Related Party Transactions

Pursuant to its written charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing NI’s policies relating to the avoidance of conflicts of interests and past or proposed transactions between NI, members of the Board of Directors of NI, and management. NI considers “related person transactions” to mean all transactions involving a “related person,” which under SEC rules means an executive officer, director or a holder of more than five percent of NI’s common stock, including any of their immediate family members and any entity owned or controlled by such persons. The Audit Committee determines whether the related person has a material interest in a transaction and may approve, ratify, rescind or take other action with respect to the transaction in its discretion.

In any transaction involving a related person, NI’s Audit Committee would consider the available material facts and circumstances of the transaction, including: the direct and indirect interests of the related person; the risks, costs and benefits of the transaction to NI; whether any alternative transactions or sources for comparable services or products are available; and, in the event the related person is a director (or immediate family member of a director or an entity with which a director is affiliated), the impact that the transaction will have on such director’s independence.

After considering such facts and circumstances, NI’s Audit Committee determines whether approval, ratification or rescission of the related person transaction is in NI’s best interests. NI’s Audit Committee believes that all employees and directors should be free from conflicting interests and influences of such nature and importance as would make it difficult to meet their applicable fiduciary duties and loyalty to NI, and reviews all related party transactions against the foregoing standard.

NI’s written policies and procedures for review, approval or ratification of transactions that pose a conflict of interest, including related person transactions, are set forth in its Code of Ethics, which contains, among other policies, a conflicts of interest policy for all employees, including NI’s executives, and a conflicts of interest policy fornon-employee directors.

Under NI’s written conflicts of interest policy applicable to all employees, including NI’s executives, every employee is required to report to NI’s PresidentCEO any information regarding the existence or likely development of conflicts of interest involving themselves or others within NI. While NI provides examples of potential conflicts of interests,interest, such as investments in enterprises that do business with NI, compensation for services to any person or firm which does business with NI, or gifts and loans and entertainment from any person or firm having current or prospective dealings with NI, the policy applicable to employees expressly states that the examples provided are illustrative only and that each

employee should report

any other circumstance which could be construed to interfere actually or potentially with loyalty to NI. Transactions involving potential conflicts of interests for employees are reviewed by NI’s President,CEO, who makes a determination as to whether there exists any conflict of interest or relationship which violates NI’s policies and the appropriate actions to take with respect to such relationship. NI’s General Counsel reports to the Audit Committee the conflict of interest reports received and acted upon by the President.CEO. In the event a report was received concerning a potential conflict of the PresidentCEO or a member of the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee would review such matter.

The written conflicts of interest policy applicable to allnon-employee directors is substantially similar to the conflicts of interest policy applicable to NI employees, with the exception that everynon-employee director is required to report potential conflict of interest situations to the Audit Committee, which is responsible for making the determination as to whether there exists any conflict of interest or relationship which violates such policy. If the Audit Committee determines that a conflict of interest exists, thenon-employee director involved will be required to dispose of the conflicting interest to the satisfaction of the Audit Committee.

BOARD COMPENSATION

Determining Compensation forNon-Employee Directors in 20152018

The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nomination and Governance Committee, setsnon-employee directors’ director compensation with the goal of retaining NI’s directors and attracting qualified persons to serve as directors. In developing its recommendations, the Nomination and Governance Committee considers director compensation at comparable publicly-traded companies and aims to structure director compensation in a manner that is transparent and easy for stockholders to understand.

The compensation ofnon-employee directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152018 is set forth in the table below.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20152018

Discussion of Director Compensation

In 2015,2018, the annual compensation for NI’snon-employee directors was comprised of cash compensation in the form of an annual retainer, committee chair retainer, committee membership

retainer, lead independent director retainer and equity compensation in the form of RSUs. Each of these components is described below. An NI employee director does not receive any additional compensation for his service as a director. Thus, neither Mr. Davern nor Mr. Kodosky receives any compensation for his service as a director.

We last adjusted the cash compensation of ournon-employee directors effective October 1, 2017 after consideration of data and advice provided by F.W. Cook, an independent compensation consultant. Based on data previously provided by F.W. Cook, which indicated that the compensation for ournon-employee directors was at the lower end of the range of the comparable companies used for executive compensation purposes,non-employee director equity compensation was increased to $175,000 per year on April 25, 2018.

Annual Board/Committee Retainer Fees

In 2015, the annual compensation for NI’s For 2018, ournon-employee directors was comprised ofreceived cash compensation, payable quarterly, for membership on the board of directors and committees, as well as for committee chair positions. Non-employeepositions, the lead independent director position and the independent board chair position. Specifically,non-employee directors receive an annual cash retainer of $60,000 per year, plus $5,000$10,000 per year for membership on the Audit Committee, and $2,500$7,500 per year for membership on each of the Compensation Committee, and $5,000 per year for membership on the Nomination and Governance Committee. In addition, the chairpersons of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nomination and Governance Committee receive an additional $15,000, $10,000$25,000, $20,000 and $5,000$15,000 per year, respectively.respectively, and the Lead Independent Director receives an additional $25,000 per year.

In September 2018, the Board appointed NI’s first Independent Board Chair. In October 2018, after consideration of data provided by Compensia, an independent compensation consultant, the Board approved an annual cash retainer of $100,000 per year for the Independent Board Chair effective September 19, 2018. In light of the appointment of an Independent Board Chair, NI no longer has a Lead Independent Director.

The Board in its discretion may pay an overnight meeting fee or special meeting fee for extended meetings, not to exceed $2,000 per day. An NI employee director does not receive any additional compensation for service as a director.

Non-Employee Director Reimbursement Practice

Non-employee directors are reimbursed for travel and otherout-of-pocket expenses connected to Board service.

Restricted Stock Unit Awards

Under NI’s applicable Incentive Plan,non-employee directors are eligible to receive RSU grants. Specifically, eachnon-employee director receives an annual grant of RSUs equal to $130,000$175,000 divided

by the closing price of NI’s common stock on the day immediately preceding the date of grant. Under the 20102015 Incentive Plan, in 2015, Dr. Carlton,2018, Mr. Roesslein, Ms. Le, Mr. Berra, and Mr. McGrath, and Dr. Fettweis were each granted 4,0383,561 RSUs based on NI’s closing stock price of $32.20$49.18 per share on April 21, 2015.24, 2018. The RSUs granted to Dr. Carlton, Mr. Roesslein, Ms. Le, Mr. Berra, and Mr. McGrath, and Dr. Fettweis vest over a three-year period withone-third of the RSUs vesting on each anniversary of the vesting commencement date, which is May 1 of each year.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth information concerning the persons serving as executive officers of NI as of the Record Date, including information as to each executive officer’s age, position with NI and business experience. Officers of NI serve at the discretion of the Board.

See “Election“Proposal One: Election of Directors” for additional information with respect to Dr. Truchard.

Alexander M. Davern joined NI in February 1994 and currently serves as Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. He previously served as NI’s Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, IT and Manufacturing Operations and Treasurer from December 2002 to October 2010; as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from December 1997 to December 2002; as Acting Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from July 1997 to December 1997; and as Corporate Controller and International Controller from February 1994 to July 1997. Prior to joining NI, Mr. Davern worked both in Europe and in the United States for the international accounting firm of Price Waterhouse, LLP. Mr. Davern received his bachelor’s degree in Commerce and a diploma in professional accounting from University College in Dublin, Ireland. Mr. Davern is a director of Helen of Troy and Cirrus Logic, Inc., both publicly traded companies.Davern.

Eric H. Starkloffjoined NI in July 1997 and currently serveshas served as President and Chief Operating Officer since October 2018. He previously served as Executive Vice President, Global Sales and Marketing. He previously served as NI’sMarketing from February 2014 to October 2018; Senior Vice President of Marketing from April 2013 to January 2014; Vice President of Marketing from November 2010 to March 2013; as Vice President of Product Marketing from October 2008 to October 2010; as Director of Product Marketing from August 2004 to September 2008; and as Product Marketing Manager from January 1998 to July 2004. Mr. Starkloff received his bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia.

Karen M. Rapp joined NI in May 2017 and has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since that time. Ms. Rapp served as Senior Vice President of Corporate Development of NXP Semiconductors N.V. (“NXP”), a Dutch global semiconductor manufacturer, after NXP acquired Freescale Semiconductor in December 2015. Ms. Rapp previously served in several positions at Freescale, including serving as Vice President and Chief Information Officer from April 2013 to December 2015 and as Director of Operations and Finance, Global Sales and Marketing from April 2010 to April 2013. Ms. Rapp holds a bachelor’s degree in Finance from Northern Illinois University and a master’s degree in Business Administration from the University of Texas at Austin. Ms. Rapp is currently a director of Plexus Corp., a publicly traded company.

Scott A. Rust joined NI in 1990 and currently serveshas served as Senior Vice President, Global Product Research and Development since January 2019. He previously served as Senior Vice President, Global Research and Development. He previously servedDevelopment from January 2014 to January 2019; as NI’s Vice President of Research and Development Test Systems from July 2013 to January 2014; as NI’s Vice President of Research and Development in Penang, Malaysia from January 2011 to July 2013; as Vice President of Research and Development of Modular Instruments from October 2008 to December 2010; as Director of Modular Instruments from March 2003 to September 2008; as Software Section Manager from October 2000 to March 2003; as Group Manager from October 1996 to October 2000; as Marketing Manager of Test and Measurement Software from August 1991 to September 1996; and as Applications Engineer from June 1990 to July 1991. Mr. Rust received his bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering from Texas A&M University.

John C. Roiko joined NI in 1998 and has served as Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer since May 2017. From January to May 2017, he served as Interim Chief Financial Officer. He formerly served as Vice President of Finance from October 2008 to December 2016 and as worldwide Corporate Controller from March 1998 to September 2008. Prior to joining NI, Mr. Roiko worked as a product line controller for the defense division at Honeywell before moving to Emerson Process Management as the North Americas accounting manager. Mr. Roiko then pursuedstart-up opportunities as the Chief Financial Officer for Columbia Scientific and director of accounting for Arrowsmith Technologies. Mr. Roiko holds a bachelor’s degree in Finance with a minor in Accounting from St. Cloud State University and a master’s degree from Minnesota State University.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The followingCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”provides information regarding the 2018 compensation program for our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, and the three executive officers (other than our principal executive officer and principal financial officer) at fiscalyear-end who were our most highly-compensated executive officers (our “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”). The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the compensation tables contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. ReferencesProxy Statement. For 2018, our Named Executive Officers were:

Executive Officer Change during 2018

Mr. Starkloff was appointed as our President and Chief Operating Officer effective October 23, 2018. Prior to his promotion, Mr. Starkloff had served as our Executive Vice President, Global Sales and Marketing since January 2014 and as our Senior Vice President, Marketing, from April 2013 to January 2014. Mr. Starkloff also previously served in the roles of Vice President, Marketing, Vice President, Product Marketing, Director of Product Marketing, Product Marketing Manager, and Applications Engineer.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the material elements of our executive compensation program during 2018. It also provides an overview of our executive compensation philosophy, including our principal compensation policies and practices. Finally, it analyzes how and why the Compensation Committee arrived at the specific compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers, in 2018, and discusses the key factors that the Compensation Committee considered in determining their compensation.

Executive Summary

Who We Are

For over 40 years, NI has enabled engineers and scientists around the world to accelerate productivity, innovation and discovery. Our software-centric platform provides an advanced approach through integration of software and modular hardware to create automated test and automated measurement systems. We believe our long-term track record for innovation and our differentiated platform helps support the success of our customers, employees, suppliers, and stockholders.

Say-on-Pay Vote and Introduction of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards

We view the stockholder advisory vote on named executive officer compensation (theso-called“Say-on-Pay”) as an opportunity to receive feedback from our stockholders about our executive compensation program. In addition, prior to our “namedAnnual Meeting of Stockholders we reach out to our major stockholders to engage with them on their views and concerns about our executive officers”compensation

policies and practices. Prior to our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we engaged with several of our stockholders and specifically requested feedback on our executive compensation program. Specific to executive compensation, the feedback received was focused on three areas: (i) our CEO pay relative to total stockholder return, (ii) that our long-term incentive (“LTI”) program for our NEOs did not include performance-based RSUs, but instead only time-based RSUs, and (iii) a lack of transparency about our Annual Incentive Program (“AIP”) bonus goals. We listened to this feedback and have attempted to address all three concerns.

At our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 58% of the votes cast on theSay-on-Pay proposal were voted in favor of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. While this CD&A arerepresented more than majority support of the proposal, our Board of Directors recognized that these results were less than what it considered to be satisfactory, particularly in light of the same personsfact that approximately 99% of the votes cast on our 2017Say-on-Pay proposal were voted in favor of our Named Executive Officers’ compensation. When considering the compensation trend of our CEO over the past several years, we note that our former CEO, Dr. James J. Truchard, was a founder and major stockholder of NI and, at his request, he received a nominal base salary of $1.00 and did not participate in our bonus plans or receive equity awards. When Alex Davern became CEO on January 1, 2017, we moved to a market-based approach to compensating our CEO. Mr. Davern’s compensation since becoming CEO is set forth in the summarySummary Compensation Table of this Proxy Statement. Since our former CEO was not paid any base salary, bonus or equity, we only have two years (i.e., 2017 and 2018) of meaningful compensation table.data for the CEO position.

In response to the stockholder feedback received in connection with our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Compensation Committee determined that we should add performance-based equity awards to our LTI compensation program. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee approved the introduction of performance-based restricted stock unit (“PRSU”) awards to be granted to our Named Executive Officers, beginning in January 2019. These PRSU awards represented 50% of the equity award value granted to our Named Executive Officers, with the other 50% of their award value consisting of time-based restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards. In addition, based on stockholder feedback, we have included additional information in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis regarding the performance goals and calculation of the payouts under our AIP for executive officers for 2018.

The PRSU awards may be earned based on our total stockholder return (“TSR”) compared to the TSR of the Russell 2000 Index (the “Index”) over a three-year performance period commencing on January 1, 2019 and ending on December 31, 2021 (using the average daily closing price over a30-day lookback in each case). The number of shares of NI common stock subject to the awards will be earned from 0% to 200% of the target award based on our TSR compared to the Index as follows:

We believe that our use of performance-based LTI compensation is important to strengthen the alignment of our executive officers’ compensation to stockholder value creation, as well as driving the achievement of NI’s financial and operational goals. In light of this belief, in January 2019, the

Compensation Committee granted PRSU awards and time-based RSU awards to our Named Executive Officers in the amounts set forth in the following table:

In recognition of the value of our stockholder outreach program, we have continued our outreach efforts in early 2019 to engage in a dialogue regarding recent changes to our bylaws to allow for proxy access beginning in 2020 and changes to our executive compensation methodology where many of the recommendations from our prior outreach were implemented for 2019. In addition, effective March 2019, we will have two new independent board members with experience that maps closely to our corporate strategy. The addition of two new directors will also significantly reduce the average tenure of our Board members. We have described our Board search process (including the specific objective of identifying highly qualified diverse candidates) as a part of our outreach discussions and we will continue to focus on the diversity of our Board in the future.

We plan to continue to enhance our outreach program to drive consistent engagement and to listen and learn from our stockholders while forming strong relationships in the process.

Business Highlights

During 2018, we achieved record revenue and record operating income as illustrated in the charts below. We also achieved a number of other important financial and operational results as described below. We believe these achievements reflect the value that our platform-based approach provides to our customers and our execution on our commitment to financial and operational excellence.

2018|Record Revenue 2018|Record Operating Income

In 2018, we achieved the following important financial and operationalresults:

OverviewExecutive Compensation Highlights

For 2018, the Compensation Committee took the following actions with respect to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers:

In establishing these compensation arrangements, the Compensation Committee took into consideration Mr. Starkloff’s experience and skills as well as the competitive market for similar positions at other comparable companies based on a review of compensation survey data.

Pay-for-Performance Discussion

Our 2018 executive compensation program, which consisted of base salary, an annual cash bonus opportunity under our AIP, an annual cash bonus opportunity under our Annual Performance Bonus program, LTI compensation in the form of equity awards, and other benefits, was closely linked to stockholder value creation through the achievement of our short-term and long-term financial, operational and strategic objectives.

The 2018 pay mix for our CEO and our other Named Executive Officers was predominantly variable or “at risk.” As the following charts illustrate, for 2018, 80% of our CEO’s target total direct compensation (defined as the sum of his 2018 base salary, target AIP bonus opportunity, target Annual Performance Bonus Program opportunity, and the intended target value of his equity awards) and 73% of the average target total direct compensation of our other Named Executive Officers’ was delivered in the form of variable or “at risk” compensation.

Further, LTI compensation in the form of equity awards represented 59% of our CEO’s target total direct compensation and 53% of the average target total direct compensation of our other Named Executive Officers.

Executive Compensation Policies and Practices

We endeavor to maintain sound governance standards consistent with our executive compensation policies and practices. The Compensation Committee evaluates our executive compensation program on a regular basis to ensure that it is consistent with our short-term and long-term goals given the dynamic nature of our business and the market in which we compete for executive talent. The following summarizes our executive compensation and related policies and practices:

What We Do

What We Do Not Do

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

NI’sOur executive compensation philosophy towardsis based on the concept of pay for performance and aligned to the following primary goals:

Based on this philosophy, our executive officers reflectscompensation program is guided by the following overarching principles:

We also maintain a strong focus on leadership development and retention, and as such, our executive compensation program is designed to ensure that we retain the talent required to execute our business strategy. The compensation actions and decisions for our Named Executive Officers support our talent retention objectives by considering individual contributions to our performance, long-term potential and holding power and organizational succession plans.

We regularly assess and adjust our executive compensation program, policies and practices in light of these overarching principles and, in doing so, consider feedback obtained through our stockholder engagement efforts.

Compensation-Setting Process

DeterminingRole of Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors, is responsible for reviewing and approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, subject to any approval of our Board of Directors that the Compensation Committee or legal counsel determines to be desirable or is required by applicable law or Nasdaq rules. Specifically, the Compensation Committee oversees our executive compensation plans, administers our equity compensation plans and reviews and approves the compensation of our executive officers. With respect to the compensation of the CEO, the Compensation Committee recommends such compensation to the independent directors of the Board of Directors who also separately approve it.

The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our Board of Directors. A copy of the charter is posted on the investor relations section of our website located at http://www.ni.com/pdf/nati/us/comp_charter.pdf.

As described in greater detail in the next section, the Compensation Committee considers both NI performance and individual performance when determining the overall compensation levels for our Named Executive Officers, as well as the individual elements of compensation. For example, in determining increases in base salary and LTI compensation opportunities, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration, among other things, the prior individual performance of an executive officer, as well as NI’s performance. Similarly, the AIP is designed to incent our executive officers to achieve our business objectives, as well as individual performance goals, as set forth in our annual operating plan. For other compensation elements, such as the Annual Performance Bonus Program, NI’s performance as a whole is determinative of the amounts payable to participants. The Compensation Committee believes that the various elements of executive compensation should work together to promote our objective that total compensation should be related both to company and individual performance.

Setting Total Direct Compensation

The Compensation Committee does not establish a specific target for the total direct compensation opportunity of our Named Executive Officers. In making decisions about the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee relies primarily on its general experience and subjective considerations of various factors, including the following:

These factors provide the framework for compensation decision-making and final decisions regarding the compensation opportunity for each executive officer. No single factor is determinative in setting compensation levels, nor is the impact of any individual factor on the determination of pay levels quantifiable.

The Compensation Committee does not weigh these factors in any predetermined manner, nor does it apply any formulas in developing its compensation decisions. The members of the Compensation Committee consider all of this information in light of their individual experience, knowledge of NI, knowledge of the competitive market, knowledge of each executive officer, and business judgment in making these decisions.

Role of Management

In establishing NI’s overall program forour executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee works closely with NI’sour senior management, including its Chief Executive Officerour CEO and Vice President of Global Human Resources. However, NI’s executives do not participate in any Board orIn 2018, the Compensation Committee deliberations relating to their own compensation.

obtained input from our CEO when discussing the performance of, and compensation levels for our executive officers (other than himself). The Compensation Committee engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co. (“F.W. Cook”)also worked closely with our CEO and Vice President of Global Human Resources and others, as an independent consultant for 2011required, in evaluating the financial, accounting, tax, talent management/succession planning and retention implications of our executive compensation purposes. At that time,program and its various elements. Neither our CEO nor any of our other executive officers are present when their own compensation is being discussed by the Compensation Committee.

Role of Compensation Consultant

Historically, the Compensation Committee determined to engage an independent compensation consultant every three years. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee again engaged F. W. Cook as an independent consultant for 2011, 2014, and 2017 compensation purposes.

In 2017, F.W. Cook in 2014 to review NI’sreviewed our overall executive compensation structure and performperformed an analysis and assessment of NI’sour compensation processes, methodologies and practices to evaluate their effectiveness and alignment with NI’sour compensation philosophy and objectives (as outlined above).objectives. As part of its analysis, the consulting firmF.W. Cook reviewed compensation trends and developments, compensation levels for a number of companies that were comparable to NI in terms of market capitalization, industry

focus, revenue size and number of employees (including the Radford data used by NI in prior years as described below), NI executive compensation levels and certain disclosure and regulatory requirements.

As a result of its analysis, F.W. Cook concludedalso proposed the compensation peer group of 15 companies that NI’swas approved by the Compensation Committee in February2017.

Following the results of ourSay-on-Pay vote in 2018, the Compensation Committee reevaluated our compensation consulting relationship and, after considering several leading advisors, in June 2018 the Compensation Committee engaged Compensia, Inc., a national compensation consulting firm (“Compensia”), as its compensation consultant to advise on executive compensation matters. Initially, at the direction of the Compensation Committee, Compensia performed a comprehensive review of our executive compensation program was highly effective, enabled NIin October 2018. In addition to attractthe foregoing, Compensia provided the following for the Compensation Committee during 2018:

The Compensation Committee consideredhas evaluated its relationships with Compensia to ensure that it believes that such firm is independent from management. This review process included a review of the consultant’s work in establishing executiveservices that such compensation levels for 2015. In connectionconsultant provided, the quality of those services and the fees associated with the engagementservices provided during 2018. Based on this review, as well as consideration of F.W. Cookthe factors affecting independence set forth in 2014,the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market and the relevant SEC rules, the Compensation Committee has determined that F.W. Cookno conflict of interest was raised and Compensia met the independence requirements of applicable SEC and Nasdaqsuch rules. Other than its engagement by the Compensation Committee in 2011 and 2014, F.W. CookCompensia has not provided any other services to NI.

Competitive Positioning

In making its compensation decisions for 2018, the Compensation Committee or NI.used industry specific compensation data drawn from the most recent Radford Global Technology Survey. The Radford data was derived from two data screens. The first screen was based on executive compensation information of publicly-traded companies in the technology sector with annual revenues ranging from $1 billion to $3 billion and the second screen was based on the executive compensation information for a select group of 15 peer companies, 14 of which participate in the Radford Global Technology Survey. These peer companies are as follows:

As described below, NI utilizes survey information to help determine whether

Base Salary

Base salary represents the fixed portion of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, and is an important element of compensation intended to attract and retain highly-talented individuals. We use base salary to provide each executive officer with a competitive level of cash compensation during the year with the expectation that he or she will perform his or her responsibilities to the best of his or her ability and in our best interests.

Generally, we establish the initial base salaries of our executive officers througharm’s-length negotiation at the time we hire the individual executive officer, taking into account his or her position, qualifications, experience, prior salary level, external market data, and the base salaries of our other executive officers. Thereafter, the Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries of our executive officers annually, with input from our CEO (except with respect to his own base salary) and makes adjustments as it determines to be reasonable and necessary to reflect the scope of an executive officer’s performance, individual contributions and responsibilities, position in the case of a promotion, and market conditions. The Compensation Committee does not use a specific formula, but instead the committee members exercise their judgment in view of our compensation philosophy and objectives.

In January 2018, the Compensation Committee reviewed the base salaries of our Named Executive Officers, taking into consideration a competitive market analysis prepared by management and the recommendations of our CEO, as well as the other factors described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation-Setting Process—Setting Target Total Direct Compensation” above. Following this review, the Compensation Committee approved base salary increases for each of our Named Executive Officers as follows:

Under the AIP, each of our executive officers is eligible to receive an incentive bonus opportunity (which is expressed as a percentage of the executive officer’s annual base salary as determined by the Compensation Committee) and to earn a bonus payment based upon the attainment of corporate and individual performance objectives approved in accordance with the AIP. For the purposes of the AIP, the base salary amount to be used to set the target incentive bonus opportunity is determined by the Compensation Committee at the time the performance goals for that year’s plan are approved.

Under the AIP, the actual bonus payment that may be earned by an executive officer may be more or less than the target incentive bonus opportunity based on the nature of the performance objectives, the actual performance of him or her measured against such objectives and the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

Typically, three to five performance objectives are selected for each executive officer that are intended to reward achievements in his or her functional area or which represent our corporate business goals for the year. The performance objectives for our executive officers are determined by our CEO after consultation with each executive officer and then presented by our CEO for approval by the Compensation Committee, except that the performance objectives for our CEO are selected by the Compensation Committee. The amount of the bonus for an executive officer which is allocated to each specific objective is approved each year by the Compensation Committee. For purposes of the AIP, the performance objectives selected for our Named Executive Officers involved revenue growth,non-GAAP operating margin, key employee retention and operating expenses. The range of payouts under the AIP is 0% to 200% with a 50% payout if the minimum target of a particular goal is achieved. The weighting and performance levels for each of these objectives in 2018 were as follows:

For 2018, the target AIP bonuses and the amount of AIP bonuses paid for our Named Executive Officers were as follows:

In April 2018, the relevant eligibility requirements may also participateCompensation Committee determined that the equity awards to be granted to our Named Executive Officers, should be in the form of time-based RSU awards for shares of NI common stock. The Compensation Committee approved the following programs:RSU awards for our Named Executive Officers in April 2018:

Notwithstanding the provisions of the 2015 Incentive Plan, with respect to PRSUs, if a change of control occurs before the last day of the performance period, rather than vesting based on the Company’s TSR relative to the Index during the performance period, the number of PRSUs eligible to vest will equal 100% of the target number of PRSUs. The number of PRSUs so determined will be scheduled to vest in equal monthly installments following the change of control over the remainder of the original performance period. Following any assumption or substitution of such awards, if the employment of an employee is terminated without “cause” (as defined in the 2015 Incentive Plan) within 24 months following the change in control of NI, then the vesting of such employee’s award will immediately accelerate and the restricted stock, RSU and PRSU awards will immediately become fully vested.

Other Compensation Policies

Equity Award Grant Policy

We do not have any program, plan or practice to time the grant of equity awards in coordination with the release of materialnon-public information. In addition, we do not time, nor do we plan to time, the release of materialnon-public information for the purposes of affecting the value of our executive compensation.

Stock Ownership Policy

We encourage our executive officers to hold a significant equity interest in NI. Our Board of Directors adopted a Stock Ownership Policy effective December 31, 2017 to further align the interests of our executive officers and the non-employee members of our Board of Directors with the interests of our stockholders and to promote our commitment to good corporate governance. The guidelines established under this policy are intended to take into account an individual’s needs for portfolio diversification, while maintaining an ownership interest at levels sufficient to assure our stockholders of our management and Board of Directors’ commitment to long-term value creation.

Under our Stock Ownership Policy:

Our CEO, our executive officers, and thenon-employee members of our Board of Directors are required to achieve the applicable level of ownership within five years of the date of adoption of the policy.

Compensation Recovery Policy

Currently, we have not implemented a policy regarding retroactive adjustments to any cash or equity-based incentive compensation paid to our executive officers and other employees where the payments were predicated upon the achievement of financial results that were subsequently the subject of a financial restatement. We intend to adopt a general compensation recovery (“clawback”) policy once the SEC adopts final rules implementing the requirement of Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Derivative Trading, Short Sales, Margin Accounts and Hedging

Pursuant to our Insider Trading Policy, we do not permit our executive officers or thenon-employee members of our Board of Directors to sell short our securities. In addition, we prohibit our executive officers and thenon-employee members of our Board of Directors from holding our securities in a margin account. We further prohibit the purchase or sale of publicly-traded options and other derivatives with respect to our securities, including for any hedging or similar transaction, by our executive officers and ournon-employee directors.

EffectofTax and Accounting and Tax Treatment on Compensation DecisionsConsiderations

In designing our executive compensation program, the review and establishment of NI’s compensation programs, NICompensation Committee considers the anticipated accountingtax and taxaccounting implications to NI and its executives. In this regard, in 2005,our executive officers. While the NI Board of Directors and Compensation Committee determined to change NI’s equity compensation program fromconsiders the use of stock options to the use of RSUs in response to changes in theapplicable tax and accounting treatment of equity awards under FASB ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. While NI considers the applicable accounting and tax treatment,elements of our executive compensation program, these factors alone are not dispositive and NI also considers the cash and non-cash impactin its decision making.

Deductibility of the programs and whether a program is consistent with NI’s overall compensation philosophy and objectives.Executive Compensation

Generally, Section 162(m) of the Code (“Section 162(m)”) imposes a limit on the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of any remuneration in excess of $1 million paid to our CEO, chief financial officer, and each of the three next most highly-compensated executive officers of the company. Prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on the amount ofDecember 22, 2017, compensation that NI may deduct in any one year with respectsatisfied conditions set forth under Section 162(m) to qualify as “performance-based compensation” was not subject to this limit, and the limit did not apply to compensation paid to the chief financial officer. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the exemption for “performance-based compensation” beginning January 1, 2018. As a result, subject to certain exceptions, we expect that compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers in excess of its named executive officers, unless certain criteria are satisfied. Performance-based compensation, as defined in the Code, is fully deductible if the programs are approved by stockholders and meet other requirements. In general, NI has determined that it$1 million generally will not seek to limit executive compensation so that it is deductible under Section 162(m). NI seeks to maintain flexibility in compensating its executives in a manner designed to promote its corporate goals and thereforebe deductible. While the Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy requiring all compensationtaken steps in the past to be deductible.